Research summary of the report: ‘Understanding barriers and enablers to community participation for people with psychosocial disabilities in Fiji’
Background
Community participation is a fundamental right under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), which Fiji has ratified. Despite this, people with psychosocial disabilities in Fiji continue to face significant barriers to inclusion. These barriers are rooted in stigma, discriminatory attitudes, and outdated legal frameworks that reinforce institutionalisation and deny individuals their rights to autonomy and participation.
This addresses a critical gap in evidence from the Pacific region by centering the voices of people with psychosocial disabilities and their families. It explores the lived experiences of inclusion and exclusion, identifies systemic and social barriers, and highlights strategies for promoting meaningful participation in community life.
This research was led by researchers from the Psychiatric Survivors Association of Fiji (the National Organisation of People with Disabilities representing people with psychosocial disabilities) and CBM Australia, and with research guidance from the University of Melbourne and Fiji National University, and made possible through funding from CBM Australia.
What did the researchers do?
Most participants had experienced exclusion based on their disability, including denial of decision-making rights, abuse, and limited access to services. Stigma was reinforced by institutional legacies, media portrayals, and discriminatory laws. Inclusion – when present – was transformative, improving mental health and fostering a sense of belonging. Peer support networks, especially those led by the Psychiatric Survivors Association, were vital in enabling participation. Legislative frameworks, particularly the Mental Health Act 2010, were found to be inconsistent with CRPD principles and contributed to systemic exclusion.
How can readers use this research?
This research provides actionable insights for policymakers, service providers, community organisations, families and individuals. It underscores the importance of rights-based approaches, inclusive service design, and the central role of lived experience in shaping effective supports. Readers can use this evidence to advocate for legislative reform, scale up peer support, and promote inclusive practices in communities.
Policy implications
“Inclusion isn’t just about being present – it’s about being valued, heard, and supported. When we are included, we feel like we belong. That changes everything.”
• People with psychosocial disabilities in Fiji face systemic exclusion across social, cultural, economic, and political domains.
• Stigma, discriminatory laws, and lack of community-based supports are key barriers to inclusion.
• Inclusion and peer support significantly improve emotional wellbeing and community participation.
• Legislative reform and investment in rights-based, community-driven support systems are urgently needed:
-
- Repeal or revise discriminatory laws, including the Mental Health Act 2010, to align with the CRPD.
- Recognise psychosocial disability as a distinct impairment group in disability support systems.
- Invest in community-based, rights-oriented services and supports.
- Promote supported decision-making and ensure legal capacity for all individuals.
- Include people with psychosocial disabilities in policy design, implementation, and evaluation.
- Invest in community awareness raising and education about psychosocial disability using disability rights frameworks.
Supporting Children with Disabilities in the Philippines
The impact of our “Enable Communities for Inclusion of Children and Youth with Disabilities” project in the Philippines over three years.
Nigeria Women’s Health Projects Evaluation
Evaluation summary highlighting the impact of the work of CBM and our partners in reducing obstetric fistula in Nigeria, by training healthcare workers, increasing community awareness and improving medical facilities and resources.
Good practice in Community Based Inclusive Development
CBM Australia recently looked back at evaluations of our international programs over the last four years. These are some of the common learnings around good practice when working with people with disabilities in CBID programs.
What recent evaluations are telling us about our work in livelihoods
CBM Australia recently looked at evaluations of our CBID work over the last five years. While many evaluations highlighted big transformations in people’s lives because of livelihoods support, overall, the outcomes were mixed.
Study demonstrates people are better off
Since 2015, CBM Australia has tracked how the economic situation of people with disabilities and their families in rural India has changed, as a result of our Community Based Inclusive Development project. Here’s what we found.
Addressing Poverty through Disability Inclusive Development
8 Case Studies on the inclusion of people with disabilities and their families in development initiatives.
Self help groups and disability inclusion
Guidance for project implementers.
Disability, Gender and Unpaid Care Work
Recognising, valuing and redistributing unpaid care work in CBM’s programs.
What is CBID – an infographic
CBID in the Philippines
NGOs and OPDs work in a context of decentralised government systems that have legal and budgetary support for disability.
CBID in Cameroon
A local NGO service provider is taking a community mobilisation approach with local government and organisations, in a resource poor setting with limited national government engagement.
CBID in Nicaragua
A three-way collaboration of government, NGO and OPDs is bringing brought a CBID approach to scale in a low resource setting.
CBID in Papua New Guinea
A national NGO collaborates with national government departments to deliver a similar model across the country.
CBID in India
State-level NGOs support the development of local self-help groups and OPDs, that influences local government for inclusion.
CBID’s top down and bottom up approach
An infographic.